Join the JBL Tune 135BT Earbuds - Black Fans Community
Use the tabs below to see what music people who love this gear like, explore its tech specs and read reviews by other members. Stay tuned, more community features are coming up!
2 reviews from our community
Please note that the following reviews have not yet been verified for authenticity

"No complaints here. Precisely as..."
No complaints here. Precisely as depicted, well made and overall good buy.

"Built to last! Great bargain."
Built to last! Great bargain.
3 reasons why people want to buy it
Actual feedback of people who want to buy JBL Tune 135BT Earbuds - Black
- "I heard it is really good for its price "A 18-24 y.o. male fan of Robert Johnson from France
- "Beautiful"A 17 y.o. or younger male fan of Guns N' Roses from Hungary
- "It looks cool"A 18-24 y.o. male fan of Jimmy Page from Croatia
People that took the "IS IT GOOD FOR ME?" test said they wanted to buy JBL Tune 135BT Earbuds - Black for the above 3 reasons. Their opinion is based on their own independent research and should help in your own purchase decision.
Still undecided? Take the "IS IT GOOD FOR ME?" test
Related reviews
We recommend the following related gear as JBL Tune 135BT Earbuds - Black is not so popular with our community

"Practical, punchy in-ears for stage and monitoring with surprising comfort and solid value."
Review of Hörluchs HL 1050
I spent several weeks using the Hörluchs HL 1050 as my go-to in-ear monitor for rehearsals and short gigs, and they quickly became the pair I reach for when I need a dependable, no-nonsense monitor that focuses on low-end presence and comfort. My workflow tends to demand long wear times, clear reference for bass-heavy mixes and a cable solution that won’t fall apart between stage and transport - that’s the seat I’m writing from.
First Impressions
Out of the box the HL 1050 felt compact and very lightweight - they don’t announce themselves, they just sit in place, which I liked right away. The included selection of silicone and memory-foam tips and the fabric pouch are fine little touches; swapping tips was quick and made a big difference to seal and comfort during my first listening session. The 2-pin detachable cable with its over-ear memory wire felt secure and reinforced; I did notice the cable routing keeps things tidy on stage and reduces tugging when I move.
Design & Features
The housings are small ABS shells finished in matte black that sit low in the concha - they’re unobtrusive under in-ear cuffs or when worn for long sessions. The HL 1050 uses a removable 2-pin cable with an over-ear routing and flexible ear hook - that memory wire is helpful when you’re jumping between songs or leaning into a mic stand. On the accessory front you get multiple silicone and foam tips (S, M, L) and a soft pouch, so you can tailor fit quickly without hunting for third-party tips.
Comfort & Portability
I found the HL 1050 extremely comfortable for long wear - the compact shells and variety of tips meant I could get a secure seal without pressure points, and after 15-20 minutes I often forgot I was wearing them. The 160 cm cable gives enough reach to your beltpack or phone without excess slack on stage, and the lightweight construction makes the whole package very portable - they tuck away in the supplied pouch easily. The over-ear wire stays put under sweat and movement, which is exactly what I want for monitoring use.
Sound & Performance
The HL 1050’s character leans toward bass presence - kick, bass guitar and low synth parts come through with weight and drive, which I appreciated when mixing contemporary band and DJ-based material. Mids are serviceable and clear enough for lead vocals and instruments, although they sit slightly behind the low end compared with more neutral monitors; highs are present but not overly bright, which helps long sessions feel less fatiguing. Overall transient response and definition are good for the price and application - you get a focused, stage-friendly picture rather than studio-flat neutrality.
Isolation & Stage Use
The fit and foam tips provide respectable passive isolation - loud stage levels are attenuated enough for reliable monitoring without having to crank the in-ear volume to unhealthy levels. In busy monitor mixes I could still hear detail I needed to perform, and the bass emphasis helped the groove stay intact even in noisy environments. They aren’t sealed like custom molds, but for universal in-ears the isolation-to-comfort balance is very good.
Real-World Experience
I used the HL 1050 across rehearsals, a few short pub gigs and while running FOH checks - they were consistent in different situations. For bass-heavy sets they were especially pleasing because the low end stayed tight and didn’t turn muddy; for acoustic or vocal-forward gigs I dialed down low EQ in my monitor mix to let mids forward. I did notice on a couple of occasions the 2-pin plug could become slightly loose if I handled the cable roughly, but this was rare and easy to avoid with mindful cable routing.
The Trade-Offs
If you’re after reference neutrality or an ultra-extended treble, these aren’t the in-ears for you - they purposely lean into a more musical, bass-forward presentation that suits monitoring and live performance. Also, while the detachable cable is a solid feature, the 2-pin fit felt marginally less rock-solid than higher-end connectors on one or two test swaps - not a deal-breaker but something to be aware of if you rough-handle cables. Finally, the HL 1050 targets professional users under EU volume rules - they’re meant to be a practical live tool rather than a hi-fi consumer earphone.
Accessories & Storage
The simple fabric pouch, foam and silicone tips cover the essentials and keep the price down - I would have liked a small hard case for touring, but the pouch is fine for a gig bag. Tip selection matters here - I found the memory-foam tips gave the best isolation and low-end impact, so experiment a little to get the most out of them. Overall the accessory package matches the product’s practical, performance-first approach.
Final Verdict
The Hörluchs HL 1050 delivers a focused, bass-forward monitoring experience with excellent comfort and a practical detachable-cable design that works well for stage use. I’d recommend them to musicians, DJs and live engineers who want a reliable, affordable universal in-ear with strong low-end presence and long-wear comfort - they’re not the last word in studio reference accuracy, but for monitoring and live situations they punch well above their price. If you prioritize portability, isolation via foam tips and a sturdy over-ear cable, the HL 1050 is a solid, budget-friendly choice.
by Musicngear Verified Community ReviewsHelpful Tips & Answers
- What is the impedance and will they work with a beltpack monitor?
- They measure 16 ohms, so they work well with beltpack transmitters and personal monitor amps without needing extra gain from a headphone amplifier.
- Do they come with different ear tips and do those change the sound?
- Yes - you get silicone tips and memory-foam tips in S, M and L; switching to foam improved isolation and tightened the bass for me.
- Is the cable replaceable and is the connector reliable?
- The cable is a 2-pin detachable type routed over the ear; it’s practical and generally reliable though I treated the 2-pin joints carefully during swaps.
- How would you describe the tonal balance?
- I’d call it bass-forward with clear mids and non-fatiguing highs - ideal for groove-focused monitoring rather than studio-flat mixing.
- Are they comfortable for several hours of use?
- Yes - the small housings and tip options made them comfortable for multi-hour rehearsal sessions in my experience.
- Do they isolate well on loud stages?
- With the memory-foam tips they provide solid passive isolation suitable for loud stage environments, though customs still win for absolute isolation.
- Is there any official warranty or professional-use note?
- They’re sold with a standard warranty through retailers and are marked for professional use under EU volume rules, which is worth noting if you’re buying for consumer listening.

"Simple, stage-ready in-ears that punch above their budget with solid isolation and an honest, if slightly bright, sound."
Review of LD Systems IEHP1
I spent several weeks using the LD Systems IEHP1 as my go-to backup in-ear set for rehearsals and a handful of low-key gigs, and what struck me first was how unobtrusive they are - physically and sonically. They are a single-driver, wired in-ear built for straightforward monitoring tasks, offering reliable isolation and enough low-end to keep mixes coherent without getting in the way.
First Impressions
When I first put the IEHP1s on, the fit and weight were immediately comfortable - they feel lightweight in the ear and the supplied silicone tips gave me a snug seal quickly. The cable is long and stage-friendly, and the 3.5 mm gold-plated plug felt solid into my bodypack and headphone outputs. My expectation going in was modest - these are clearly positioned as budget, stage-oriented IEMs - and they delivered cleanly on that brief with no unnecessary bells and whistles.
Design & Build
The IEHP1 is plainly styled and utilitarian, which I appreciate for stage gear - nothing fussy to break or get caught. The housings are compact and the whole pair weighs almost nothing in my pocket, while the cable feels slightly thicker than the cheapest consumer earbuds and should hold up to regular on-stage use. There is no detachable cable and no hard case included, so I treated the cable with a little extra care when tossing them into my bag - the strain relief at the jack and the Y-split are the parts you want to avoid stressing.
Comfort & Portability
I wore the IEHP1s for hours in rehearsals and they remained comfortable, thanks largely to the lightweight shells and decent tip selection. Because they are single-driver and slim, they don’t create the same pressure some larger universal IEMs do, which makes them a good choice for long sessions. The 1.5 m cable is long enough to reach bodypacks or mixers without stretching, and their low weight makes them trivial to carry as a spare pair in a gig bag pocket.
Sound Quality & Performance
Tonally the IEHP1 leans toward a balanced but slightly bright presentation - clarity in the upper mids and treble is obvious, which helps vocals and acoustic instruments sit forward in a monitor mix. The bass is present and usable for monitoring, but it’s not the deep, textured low-end you get from multi-driver IEMs; it’s tight and functional. I did notice that with very low-level headphone outputs on one mixer setup, the IEHP1s could sound harsh and at times strained on low-frequency content - in my experience that came through as an unpleasant edge rather than a pure distortion, so give them adequate drive to breathe.
Real-World Experience
I used these on stage as a backup monitor and during band rehearsals where I needed reliable isolation and consistent level. They blocked ambient stage noise well enough that I could rely on the monitor mix without wanting to crank room volume - that made it easier to focus on the mix rather than compensate for spill. When paired with a wireless bodypack or a simple headphone amp the IEHP1s held up and didn’t introduce noise; the gold-plated mini-TRS plug stayed solid in the jack throughout shifting onstage.
The Trade-Offs
The main compromises are that these are single-driver, budget IEMs so they won’t satisfy someone hunting high-resolution, multi-driver detail or extended sub-bass. The upper-mid brightness can be fatiguing for long listening sessions if you prefer a warmer, darker signature, and there’s no tactile L/R marker molded into the shells which is a minor stage annoyance in low light. Also, because the cable is fixed, replacement requires a more involved repair if it ever fails - that’s worth bearing in mind if you expect heavy day-to-day abuse.
Final Verdict
The LD Systems IEHP1 is exactly what it sets out to be - an affordable, reliable, and unobtrusive set of in-ear monitors for stage and rehearsal use. If you want ultra-detailed audio or deep bass for critical listening, they’re not the right pick, but for a working musician who needs something rugged, light, and honest for monitoring the IEHP1s are a great value. I’d recommend them as a spare pair or a budget primary for vocalists, guitarists, or engineers who need clear monitoring without breaking the bank.
by Musicngear Verified Community ReviewsHelpful Tips & Answers
- Will these work with my wireless bodypack monitor?
- Yes - I used the IEHP1 with both wired headphone outputs and wireless bodypacks without any compatibility issues, the 3.5 mm TRS plug is standard and reliable.
- Do they isolate well enough for on-stage use?
- Yes - the seal from the supplied tips gave me very usable isolation, enough to keep stage bleed manageable at typical monitor levels.
- Are they comfortable for long rehearsals?
- I found them comfortable for multi-hour rehearsals thanks to their light weight and slim profile, though personal fit will depend on your ear shape.
- Do they need a powerful amp to sound good?
- They don’t need a huge amount of power, but I did notice they sound best with a clean, adequately driven output - very low headroom sources made them sound a bit strained on bass.
- Is the cable replaceable?
- No, the cable is fixed - I treated the cable carefully and recommend storing them loosely to avoid stressing the jack or termination points.
- Do they come with different ear tips?
- Yes - they include multiple tip sizes which helped me get a reliable seal across several ear shapes I tested them on.

"Powerful, controlled low end and stage-focused detail in a rugged universal IEM package."
Review of InEar StageDiver SD-5
I spent several weeks using the InEar StageDiver SD-5 on rehearsals, a couple of quiet studio sessions and one full band gig to see how it handles both monitoring work and critical listening. My background is as a multi-instrumentalist who splits time between live performance and home mixing, so I was looking for an IEM that gives stage-level isolation and a detailed, musician-friendly voicing without sounding colored or bloated.
First Impressions
The SD-5 arrived feeling sturdily built - the housings have a dense, precise weight that immediately suggested quality tooling and thought put into the shape. The accessory kit is generous - a hard case, multiple eartips (XS-S-M-L), cleaning cloths and a threaded adapter - which made it easy to get going out of the box and felt pro-level right away.
Design & Features
These are semi-universal, anatomically contoured shells that InEar says were derived from hundreds of ear scans - that registration shows in the relatively precise fit for me, although individual results will vary. The SD-5 is a 3-way design using five balanced-armature drivers per ear, giving a claimed 10 Hz - 20 kHz bandwidth and a very high maximum SPL - the package also includes a removable cable and a 3.5 mm to 6.3 mm adapter for stage rigs.
Build Quality & Protection
The housings and nozzle finish are nicely executed with tight tolerances and no visible seams, and the nozzle filters sit flush so they feel durable in day-to-day handling. The stock cable is flexible yet thick enough to survive being tossed in a bag between rehearsals, and the hard case that comes with it is a real plus for protecting the monitors on the road.
Comfort & Portability
Fit is subjective with universal IEMs and the SD-5 shows that clearly - for me the medium tips sealed well and delivered great isolation, but after multi-hour listening sessions I did feel some fatigue - not unbearable, but noticeable compared with some ultra-light customs. The housings are compact enough to be pocketable when paired with the provided case, and the removable cable makes them easy to stow and maintain.
Sound Quality
The headline for me is the low end - the SD-5 presents bass with surprising authority and control for a balanced-armature design, with weight that reads cleanly under kick and bass guitar without smearing the mids. Mids are present and articulate, which helped vocals and guitars sit clearly in my mixes, while the highs are crisp and detailed though I did find them on the leaner side of bright at times - with very forward material the treble can sharpen and feel exposed, so tip choice and source EQ made a real difference.
Real-World Experience
On stage the SD-5 excelled - they isolate well enough to let me focus on my monitor mix and they deliver consistent, punchy cues even at lower volumes which helped reduce ear fatigue while performing. In the studio I used them for quick reference and rough mixing; they revealed enough detail to catch tuning issues and balance problems, though for final critical mastering I still leaned on larger headphones and monitors for perspective.
The Trade-Offs
If you want a neutral, ultra-smooth treble for long headphone-listening sessions the SD-5 can be a bit forward and occasionally fatiguing without careful tip selection or a touch of rolling-off the top end. Also, universals will never match the exact fit and long-wear comfort of a custom mold, so players who need all-night comfort should try them first where possible.
Storage & Organization
The included hard case is compact, protective and comfortable to drop into a gig bag, and I liked having the extra eartips separated for quick access; it makes the SD-5 practical for a working musician who hops between rehearsal, studio and live venues. The removable cable also helps if you want to swap in a braided upgrade or a different termination for wireless packs.
Final Verdict
Overall the StageDiver SD-5 impressed me as a musician-focused IEM that balances stage-ready punch with enough detail for tracking and on-stage mixing; the bass control and clarity in the mids are its strongest traits. I recommend them to drummers, bassists and front-line musicians who need tight low-end and solid isolation - if you prioritize the smoothest treble or absolute custom comfort you should audition first, but for universal monitors they deliver a very compelling package.
by Musicngear Verified Community ReviewsHelpful Tips & Answers
- Do they isolate well enough for loud stage use?
- Yes - with a proper tip size the isolation is solid and lets me bring mixes down to safer levels while retaining clarity of the in-ear feed.
- Are these comfortable for several hours of playing?
- They can be; I had good comfort for typical set lengths, but after very long sessions I noticed some pressure and switched tips to reduce fatigue.
- Can I use them with in-ear wireless packs?
- Absolutely - the removable cable and included 3.5/6.3 adapter make them easy to pair with beltpack transmitters and rack systems.
- How do they handle bass-heavy music?
- The bass is one of their standout features - punchy and controlled, it stayed tight even with heavily compressed material.
- Do they need an amplifier or a specific source?
- I ran them from phone, USB-DAC and monitor outputs and they sounded full from standard line-level sources; you don’t need a special amp to get good results.

"Airy, flexible four-driver universal IEMs with flagship tech scaled for pros and serious listeners."
Review of 64 Audio U4s
I spent several weeks using the 64 Audio U4s as my go-to in-ear monitors for studio reference checks and on-the-move listening, and what struck me first was how much flagship DNA 64 managed to pack into a universal-fit package - the U4s delivers a balanced, airy presentation while retaining a satisfying sub-bass foundation. My use case was mixed - tracking rehearsals, reference mixing on a laptop, and commuting listening - so I needed an IEM that could be both precise and forgiving across different sources and volumes.
First Impressions
Pulling the U4s out of the case I immediately noticed the solid, machined aluminum shells and the meteorite-inspired faceplates - they look and feel premium without being showy, and the slate-blue finish they ship in is tasteful and modern. The included premium cable is supple, terminating in 0.78mm two-pin connectors, and the package is generous - multiple tip types, a leather case, and four apex modules including the new m12 that ships with early units. I appreciated how the IEMs felt snug and secure in the ear right away, and how swapping apex modules was quick and tactile.
Design & Features
The U4s is a four-driver hybrid - a dynamic low driver, two balanced-armature mids, and a tia high driver - housed in CNC-anodized aluminum shells with 64 Audio's apex system and LID circuitry built in for source-consistent performance. The single-bore tia design gives the highs a spacious, open quality while apex modules allow you to tune low-end and imaging trade-offs on the fly, which I found particularly useful when moving between live rehearsal mixes and studio masters. The integrated 4-way passive crossover and Linear Impedance Design are sensible, practical features that reduce sensitivity to source output impedance so the U4s behaves consistently across a phone, a DAP, and rack pack transmitters.
Build Quality & Protection
Construction is one of the U4s' strong suits - the shells feel rugged yet refined, with tight tolerances around the faceplate and nozzle areas, and the finish resists scuffs better than a typical polycarbonate IEM. The premium leather case provided is compact and protective enough for gig bags, and the cable is a high-purity silver-plated copper braid that resisted microphonics better than I expected for a standard-terminated cable. Overall I felt comfortable tossing the case into my equipment bag without worrying about cosmetic damage.
Comfort & Portability
Comfort was very good for long listening sessions - the universal shells sealed well without causing the pressure-y fatigue I get from some sealed IEMs, likely helped by the apex venting. I swapped through silicone wide-nozzle tips, SpinFit, and the included foam tips over a few days, and found the foam tips gave the best long-term comfort and isolation while the SpinFits improved fit stability for activities. At about a standard universal IEM size, they pack and travel easily, though the aluminum shells are a touch heavier than lighter resin models - you notice that weight briefly when putting them on, but it rarely becomes fatiguing.
Sound Quality
Sonically the U4s is what sold me - there's a rare combination of controlled, physical sub-bass and an open, airy top end that keeps mixes readable and enjoyable. Bass extends deep and feels tight rather than boomy, so kick drums and synth subs have impact without clouding midrange clarity, and vocals sit forward with a natural tonal weight that made reference listening straightforward. The tia high driver contributes a sense of height and sheen that reveals detail without sounding etched, and the midband is balanced enough to work on both processed pop mixes and acoustic tracks. Swapping the apex modules noticeably changes the listening balance - the m20 gives a meatier low end, mX widens imaging with reduced sub, while the new m12 sits nicely between m15 and mX for many modern tracks - I found myself keeping m12 installed for a mix of studio and casual listening.
Real-World Experience
I used the U4s across a variety of real-world situations - busy rehearsal rooms, quiet home-mix sessions, and noisy commutes - and it adapted well to each. Onstage rehearsal with loud monitors, the apex modules and the U4s' isolation kept a clear image of my in-ear mix so I could judge vocal and guitar balances reliably, and in the studio I appreciated the imaging and separation for quick reference checks. When using a phone and a portable DAC/amp, the LID/low-impedance behavior kept tonal shifts minimal - I didn't have to chase EQ to get the same basic voicing between sources.
The Trade-Offs
No product is perfect - the U4s' price and premium finish put it in a higher tier, so it competes with both custom IEMs and high-end universals where expectations are high. Some users who prefer a very warm or V-shaped signature may find the U4s too balanced and airy, and the aluminum shells, while premium, are marginally more susceptible to being felt in the ear during extended physical activity compared to ultra-light resin shells. Finally, full benefit from the U4s' tech is most apparent when trying different apex modules and tips - out of the box settings are strong, but there's a small setup time to find your preferred module and tips.
Final Verdict
If you want a universal IEM that captures a lot of 64 Audio's flagship features - tia highs, apex personalization, and LID consistency - the U4s is an excellent middle ground between cost and performance. I recommend it for professional musicians, audio engineers, and serious listeners who value imaging and tunability without sacrificing low-end authority; just be prepared to spend a bit of time with tips and apex modules to dial in your ideal balance. For my needs - a mix of reference listening and on-the-go enjoyment - the U4s hit the sweet spot more often than not and became my preferred portable monitor for the review period.
by Musicngear Verified Community ReviewsHelpful Tips & Answers
- Are the U4s comfortable for long sessions?
- Yes - with foam tips I could wear them for multiple hours without significant discomfort, though the aluminum shells feel a bit more substantial than lightweight resin IEMs.
- Do the apex modules make a noticeable difference?
- Absolutely - swapping between m20, m15, m12, and mX altered sub-bass and imaging enough that I would choose modules depending on the music or monitoring needs.
- How do they perform with mobile phones versus dedicated amps?
- I heard consistent tonal balance across a phone, a DAP, and a small amp thanks to the LID design - they scaled with better sources but stayed coherent from basic phone outputs.
- Is isolation good for stage use?
- Isolation is solid and the apex modules let you slightly favor isolation or openness - I found them reliable for rehearsal and in-ear monitoring contexts.
- Do they need a special cable or connector?
- No - they use standard 0.78mm two-pin connectors and the included silver-plated cable is serviceable, though you can upgrade if you prefer a different termination or length.

"balance sound , good for stage IEM"
Review of Superlux HD-361 balance sound , good for stage IEM


